Hi! I’m David, a senior lecturer in British politics at the University of Liverpool.
My research interests are broad - I am interested in all aspects of British politics, party politics and electoral behaviour.
My main focus is to complete an undergraduate textbook on local government, titled Understanding UK Local Government.
I am also interested in the concept of identity and its influence on voting behaviour. This takes two main forms:
Exploring which local (sub-national) identities are politically salient, and how this salience plays out with regard to voting behaviour.
Exploring the voting behaviour of elected parliamentarians, as well as the broader reasons why they vote the way they do.
And then there’s anything else that piques my interest, typically involving voting behaviour and Liverpool’s political history. I am also the author of Whatever Happened to Tory Liverpool?, published by Liverpool University Press, and available as a hardback (£28) or an ebook (free).
I am involved in building a database of local election results from across Merseyside, imaginatively called the Merseyside Local Election Results Project.
In my spare time I’m usually found triathlon training (I’m aiming to complete my second Ironman in September 2023), doing a spot of parkrun tourism, staying up too late making maps, or abusing the spirit of the Pizza Hut buffet.
PhD in Politics, 2014 - 2017
Queen Mary University of London
MA in Politics with Research Methods, 2013 - 2014
University of Sheffield
BA in Politics and International Relations, 2010 - 2013
University of Sheffield
Commentary, journalism, and other writing
Reform councillors are more aligned with Greens when it comes to building more houses but take quite different views on crime and tax and spend.
Liverpool’s reputation as a progressive city is overhyped.
A group of MPs switched their vote between second and third reading, with those identifying as religious more likely to end up opposing the law change.
With the UK Government’s spending review due to conclude in June 2025, Mitya Pearson and David Jeffery argue that while politicians and the public mostly agree on public spending priorities, politicians need to make the case to the public where they do not.
Les députés ont récemment voté sur un projet de loi sur l’aide à mourir. Un vote où leur affiliation religieuse a joué un rôle non négligeable.
The UK and the EU have reached agreement on a post-Brexit “reset” to their relationship. Mitya Pearson and David Jeffery write that while there is support in the UK for establishing closer relations with the EU, there are major political obstacles to taking more ambitious steps like rejoining the single market.
Members of the public are more likely than MPs to think immigration has been too high in recent years.
MPs will soon vote on Kim Leadbeater’s assisted dying bill. Analysis of the second reading shows how religion, identity and party shaped support and opposition.
Legitimate grievances do not justify illegitimate behaviour
The evidence suggests traditional parties that ape the populist radical right’s policies risk boosting their rivals instead of reclaiming voters.
These proposals both show no sign of delivering significant cost savings (whilst guaranteeing less efficient provision of services) and threaten to devastate our suburban and rural activist base..
The new leader of the opposition was less popular among new MPs but took the free market vote.
Overall, the contours of this leadership election are broadly as expected – but a detailed examination of Tory MPs reveals some surprising leadership fault lines.
David Jeffery analyses the make-up of the post-election parliamentary Conservative Party, suggesting that despite being significantly smaller, the ideological divides remain much the same.
Tory Democracy offers a lesson for all those interested in taking up the challenge.
Modelling of the result suggests the former PM will lose a significant amount of support within the party, and possibly his own seat.
Penny Mordaunt’s seat is at risk while leadership hopeful Kemi Badenoch would be sitting pretty.
Millennials are drifting leftwards with age
The Conservatives have now been in government for longer than New Labour, but voters are increasingly abandoning the party. David Jeffery analyses attempts at reinvigoration such as the National Conservatism conference and the Conservative Democratic Organisation, concluding that increasing the power of party members is unlikely to be the solution.
Vote Leave, abandon the Tories?
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose kidda
Change point analysis seems to say - yeah, a bit.
A little experiment to explore the Red Liverpool narrative
Johnson is the least popular among women MPs and Jeremy Hunt managed to get a vote from the European Research Group.
Those who voted against same-sex marriage were more likely to support Leadsom than those who voted for the legislation, whilst the opposite was true for Gove.
Contrary to popular narratives that see Margaret Thatcher as the cause of Conservative decline in Liverpool, David Jeffery explains that various other factors were in play, long before Thatcher came to power. Those factors, combined with the rise of the Liberals in the 1970s, displaced the Conservatives as the main local opposition to Labour.
A crushing defeat in June could paradoxically make it easier to elect another leader from the far left.
Despite efforts to appeal to the minds and the wallets of those in the north, the Tories have yet to win hearts.
It was the rise of the Liberals, and the decline of the city’s Protestant tradition, that did for the Party.